Is there a communication gap between planners and suppliers? And if  there is, how do we bridge that gap so that teamwork can happen and  everybody’s happy?
This was the topic of a panel discussion hosted by the Minnesota  chapter of MPI this afternoon. I thought the topic intriguing, so  accepted MPI’s invitation to attend.  I’m glad I did. Not only did I  reconnect with some old friends (and made some new ones) but I thought  that taking this issue out of the closet was a healthy, honest way to  help these two groups—who can’t live without each other—find better ways  to work together.
The panel was composed of three planners and three suppliers.  Questions and comments from the audience were also encouraged. Here’s  the gist of what went down.
• In a survey taken before the meeting, both planners and suppliers  acknowledge that there’s a gap. More suppliers feel the gap (by a fairly  high percentage) than planners.
• Suppliers feel that planners do not give them enough information to  do their jobs effectively. They want to understand the client, how they  like to do business, what their meeting profiles look like, and the  purpose of the event. 
• Some planners, on the other hand, sometimes feel that this can be  overdone. Not only does it take time to fill the supplier in on the  details (and when you have many suppliers for an event, it really takes a  lot of time) but some planners are reluctant to share a lot of  information. They think the suppliers want too much information. IDEA:  consider preparing  a one-page profile to give to suppliers with  information on when and where you do your meetings, the ways you like to  be contacted, important points about your company and its culture, etc.  
• Planners said that they want long-term relationships with  suppliers, but the “fresh meat syndrome” can get in the way, with  planners feeling like the buzzards are circling overhead. Planners  sometimes feel that all the salesperson wants is a signed contract—next  week.
• Cold calling is hated by both sides—not a surprise—but some of the  suppliers felt that it will slowly disappear as both planners and  suppliers discover new ways to connect and communicate. 
• Planners will not work with someone who doesn’t do their homework.  Know who you’re calling on and what they do. Planners will also not  typically work with cold callers, or suppliers who drop by without an  appointment. They will work with the folks who sit next to them at MPI  or ISES meetings, attend the same seminars and workshops that the  planners attend, and who network (not prospect) at gatherings.
• Planners and suppliers should consider using CVBs to research and  source venues and other meeting elements. They know their cities, and  they’re FREE.
I know that both planners and suppliers read this blog. What do you  think? Are the Minnesota MPI folks spot-on, or are they missing the  boat? Is there a gap? Is it bridgeable? How? 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment